Gypsy Moth Defoliation - 2002
GIS FAQs
gypmoth2002
Metadata also available as
Frequently-anticipated questions:
What does this data set describe?
- Title:gypmoth_2002
- Abstract:This dataset includes polygons of tree defoliation
caused by gypsy moth caterpillars. They are delimited annually on 1:100,000
scale maps by aerial observers in small aircraft from altitudes of 1000
to 1500 feet above ground level. Data for this layer were collected 6/22/02.
- Supplemental_Information:All defoliation mapped during this
survey was moderate to heavy.
- How should this data set be cited?
- What geographic area does the data set cover?
- West_Bounding_Coordinate:-80.341695
- East_Bounding_Coordinate:-77.919725
- North_Bounding_Coordinate:39.073431
- South_Bounding_Coordinate:37.146263
- What does it look like?
- Does the data set describe conditions during
a particular time period?
- Calendar_Date: June 2002
- Currentness_Reference:ground condition
- What is the general form of this data set?
- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:vector digital data
- How does the data set represent geographic
features?
- How are geographic features stored in
the data set?
- This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data
types (SDTS terminology): G-polygon (185)
- What coordinate system is used to represent
geographic features?
- The map projection used is Lambert Conformal Conic.
- Projection parameters:
- Standard_Parallel:37.000000
- Standard_Parallel:39.500000
- Longitude_of_Central_Meridian:-79.500000
- Latitude_of_Projection_Origin:36.000000
- False_Easting:0.000000
- False_Northing:0.000000
- Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
- Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000512
- Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000512
- Planar coordinates are specified in meters
- The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
- The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
- The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.000000.
- The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222.
- How does the data set describe geographic features?
- gypmoth_20022002 Gypsy Moth Defoliation
- FIDInternal feature number. (Source: ESRI)Sequential
unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
- ShapeFeature geometry. (Source: ESRI)Coordinates
defining the features.
- AREAPolygon Area in square meters
- ACRESPolygon area in acres
- COUNTYCounty within which defoliation poly was mapped
Who produced the data set?
- Who are the originators of the data set?(may
include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
- Virginia Department of Forestry
- Who also contributed to the data set?
Sketch Mapping was performed by Mike Griffin and Tim
Tigner, Pilot was Phil Carpenter. Jason Braunstein digitized the sketch
maps.
- To whom should users address questions about
the data?
- Mindia Brown
Virginia Department of Forestry
GIS Manager
900 Natural Resources Drive, Suite 800
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434.977.6555 (voice)
434.296.2369 (FAX)
Why was the data set created?
Defoliation maps are used to evaluate the efficacy of
insect suppression efforts, to guide the location of ground surveys, to inform
localities of pest population status and trends, and to help analyze spatial
patterns and trends.
How was the data set created?
- From what previous works were the data drawn?
- (source 1 of 1)
- Source_Scale_Denominator:100000
- How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?
- How well have the observations been checked?
- How accurate are the geographic locations?
- How accurate are the heights or depths?
- Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
Many errors are inherent in aerial sketchmapping.
Observers vary greatly in experience and in tendency to divide or combine
contiguous polygons. Light, weather conditions and terrain have considerable
influence on what can be seen and how accurately it can be located. Different
agents can cause the same or similar signature. Mapping must begin before
defoliation is complete because refoliation quickly follows; the first
areas to be mapped tend to be underrepresented. Light defoliation is
not distinct enough to delimit. Small, isolated patches of defoliation
are easily overlooked. Attributes recorded can vary with changes in conditions
and information needed.
- How consistent are the relationships among
the observations, including topology?
How can someone get a copy of the data set?
- Are there legal restrictions on access
or use of the data?
- Access_Constraints:Data are available to all interested
parties
- Use_Constraints:Data are only to be redistributed with accompanying
metadata
- Who distributes the data set?
- [Distributor contact information not provided.]
- What's the catalog number I need to order
this data set?
- What legal disclaimers am I supposed to
read?
This information is provided with the understanding
that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn
from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
While The Virginia Department of Forestry (DOF) has
attempted to ensure that this documentation is accurate and reliable,
DOF does not assume liability for any damages caused by inaccuracies
in these data or documentation, or as a result of the failure of the
data or software to function in a particular manner. DOF makes no warranty,
express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or utility of this
information, nor does the fact of distribution constitute a warranty.
- How can I download or order the data?
- Availability in digital form:
- Cost to order the data:
Who wrote the metadata?
- Dates: Last modified: 17-Jul-2002
- Metadata author:
- Jason Braunstein
Virginia Department of Forestry
GIS Manager
900 Natural Resources Drive, Suite 800
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434.977.6555 (voice)
434.296.2369 (FAX)
- Metadata standard: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
(FGDC-STD-001-1998)
- Metadata extensions used:
Generated by mp version
2.7.3 on Wed Jul 17 08:26:13 2002